............................................ ............................................ A blog devoted to the ramblings of a small town, middle aged college professor as he experiences life and all its strange variances.
Pages
Monday, July 31, 2017
New Shoes
7 comments:
I appreciate all forms of comments on my writings. I find that I miss the sponteneity of coming to read them here when they were unmoderated. I believe I wrote less due to the moderation. I have decided to adopt limited moderation. Hopefully the prior problems with unfettered comments will not arise again. Please feel free to comment as you wish about the essays I write. I will maintain those comments that offer kind-hearted and gentle opinion... be it positive or negative. The opinions of your comments will, of course, need to have relevance to the post as well.
It must be my age...I'm not into paying for a label...As a homecare worker when I take a client I get chance to glance though a magazine or so...Well I'm shock that someone is willing to pay upper of $80 for a top and thinking it a good deal.
ReplyDeleteRight now I have a pair shoes on I believe I paid around $20, socks let call it $1.00, shorts I bought off a clearence rack $7.00, and top I got at thrift store $3.00,panties $1.00 and the most expensive thing I have on is my bra for $50...minus the under garment. It cost $10 to be cover up so I can go out in public....Coffee is on
I agree with you whole heartedly. All of my other shoes are in the neighborhood of 20-30 dollars. And most all of my clothes are also very budget friendly too. I only paid the horrible price for these running shoes because everything I have been able to read suggests that to avoid injury, runners need to have very good quality footwear. And, from what I read, the style I bought was at the lower end of price for running shoes of this type.
ReplyDeleteI do admit to being damn embarased about the price.
ReplyDeleteI believe Richard Dawkins is a non-smoker, Professor. As science advances, so does the behaviour of scientists!
ReplyDeleteA very good point, indeed. Although, from my perspective, while I like the basics of his "Selfish Gene" concept, his persona is rather too confrontational and bombastic for me to admire him. I have a bit more of a brotherly affiliation with the late Stephen J. Gould. He seemed a more congenial sort.
ReplyDeleteI guess what I mean, is that folks I found admirable, past and present were more gentle and kind sorts in terms of personality. Even Hemingway, with all of his bravado, was really a bit on the shy, self deprecating side of the spectrum. Dawkins seemed to be more wholly all about Dawkins, and others be damned. Perhaps it is a lack of humility that is at the core of my lack of admiration for him (although I admit his ideas are very interesting). Vonnegut is another example of a great man, who still seemed a good, gentle sort, by and large.
I am not sure if this makes sense or not... It is more a free expression of ideas I have.
PipeTobacco
Yes, Dicky Dawkins can be a little too cocksure. I wonder if Carl Sagan smoked a pipe?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete