The Thoughts of a Frumpy Professor

............................................ ............................................ A blog devoted to the ramblings of a small town, middle aged college professor as he experiences life and all its strange variances.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

.
Maybe We Should NOT Look Before We Leap



A recent published work on frogs is suggesting that many frogs may have learned leaping behavior independently of landing. Perhaps there is a philosophical/theological aspect to this story that needs to be explored? Perhaps there is merit in just living and doing what comes naturally.... instead of trying to think everything through before making a decision? If so, it sure as hell would be a pleasant change for me. I am beginning to wonder if I think and theorize about things too damn much (just like I am tautologically doing at this damn minute... Argh!).

Frogs Leapt Before They Landed : Amphibians Learned to Jump First, Then Mastered the Touchdown

By Sid Perkins

The Rocky Mountain tailed frog and others in its family learned to jump early in frog evolution, but have still not mastered a clean landing. Mike Jorgenson's frogs learned to leap long before they learned how to land smoothly, researchers suggest, based on the simple observation that the amphibians have been hopping around for hundreds of millions of years, but some species still have trouble sticking their landings.

Many people, and even many scientists, presume that frogs all jump the same way, says Richard L. Essner Jr., an evolutionary biologist at Southern Illinois University in Edwardsville. Per the conventional view of a hop, a frog rapidly extends its hind limbs to launch itself skyward, rotates forward as it soars gracefully through the air, and then uses its forelimbs to efficiently absorb the force of its landing.

Would that it were. New studies reveal that some species of primitive frogs — especially the ones in a family called Leiopelmatidae — are good jumpers but are amazingly klutzy at touching down. Essner and his colleagues report their findings online July 13 and in an upcoming Naturwissenschaften.

Few scientists have studied leiopelmatid frogs, and none have analyzed their jumping behavior, Essner says. He and his colleagues used high-speed video to scrutinize these frogs’ leaps and landings and then compared those movies to others of more evolutionarily advanced species, including Lithobates pipiens, the northern leopard frog, and Bombina orientalis, the oriental fire-bellied toad.

Both L. pipiens and B. orientalis began pulling their hind limbs back toward their bodies mid-leap, a trait that allowed them to more quickly position their legs for another jump. These frogs consistently landed on their forelimbs, with L. pipiens landing within a degree or so of -24° (a body angle approximately pointed toward 4 o’clock, if seen from the side jumping from left to right).

But the leiopelmatid Ascaphus montanus, the Rocky Mountain tailed frog, didn’t withdraw its legs midflight and had wildly inconsistent landings, with body angles at touchdown ranging from a 62° leg-dragging belly flop to a -71° near-tumbling face plant.

There’s an evolutionary reason for this, Essner and his colleagues speculate. The earliest frogs probably used leaping as a way to escape predators and return to the water, he notes. In such a scenario — previously proposed by other scientists, he adds — how a frog lands isn’t important. But as some ancient species of frogs became more adapted to life away from water, efficient landings allowed hops to come in quick succession — good for both evading predators and chasing prey.

“Not much is known about [primitive] frogs,” says Sandra Nauwelaerts, a biomechanicist at Michigan State University in East Lansing. Because no primitive frogs are fully terrestrial, the findings make sense, she adds.

There’s a spectrum of landing performance in frogs, says Gary Gillis, a biomechanicist at Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, Mass. In toads, for instance, the feet and legs are typically the only body parts that touch the ground during or after a hop. “People rarely think of the role of the hind limbs in landing,” he notes. “Landing successfully is what makes the next hop possible.”


* * * * *

I would like to think that perhaps I *should* stop thinking about things less... but then deep inside me, I think that to think through and analytically examine everything in minutiae, that I may be acting irresponsibly and let my family down. It is a conundrum that I think is impossible to solve.

PipeTobacco

3 Comments:

Blogger Leaking Moonlight said...

Thinking about is an act of joy full.

No conundrum necessary.

Thursday, 29 July, 2010  
Blogger BBC said...

Ever watch sand flees travel? They jump forward but turn around in mid flight and land backwards so they have to turn around and jump again to keep going in the same direction.

How retarded is that?

Thursday, 29 July, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Tuesday, 22 January, 2013  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home