Yesterday's bite guard post prompted questions revolving around "Why not just have a backup of the "good" bite guard?"
It WOULD SEEM that would be an EASY solution. Unfortunately, it is not the case. The production of a bite guard is regrettably more ART than science. The beasts are hand made, and EVEN if you were to have two made from the same dentition mold.... there are major differences in how functional they ARE after they are created (I tried that by one time having TWO made at once from the same mold).
With each one hand made, the primary contact points between the lower teeth and the bite plate's undersurface are always unique, and this leads each bite guard to have its own benefits, and also its own problems.
Added to this situation is that every dentist I have had does NOT produce his/her own bite guards, but instead has them produced in some regional outsource establishment..... further reducing the uniformity of how the touch surfaces for the teeth are going to be made.... each dentist "communicates" ideas of how to make the beast....to the place that actually makes them.... so there are many different people involved, each with their own "interpretations" of any notes, guidance, etc.
The final conundrum... is that dentists frequently tend to be "cookbook" style clinicians. For the most part, they follow a taxonomic key, er, a prescribed path from beginning to end on how things should be done and ultimately are done. I have tried diligently, during at least the last 7-8 bite splints I have had made, to coax, encourage, suggest, and even plead with the dentist to have the splint made in ways that I recognize would most benefit my own TMJ experiences. The parameters that would most help me include:
1. Having the bite guard be EXTRA THICK to keep me from as easily clenching my teeth while sleeping. My one bite guard that my dog ate, was ACCIDENTLY made roughly 2.5 times as thick than typical.... and at the time, the dentist apologized, and this was before I recognized its benefits.... I said it was ok, and that I would try it out.... and it was helpful. But, it was an accident I have never been able to convince a dentist to specifically request from the outsource place since.
2. Having the primary pressures of my bite while wearing the guard..... be on my incisors (front teeth,top and bottom).... this alleviates my major issues of CLENCHING my teeth (my molars in particular) while sleeping. The clenching I do is a major aspect of the joint pain that I will awaken with many/most mornings. Every bite guard I have had made other than the "perfect" one my dog ate was made rather FLAT across the entirety of the dentition pattern...... permitting easy CLENCHING.
3. Part of the reason for desiring points of initial contact between my upper and lower incisors is due to my atypical dentition pattern where I have a natural overbite of my upper incisors in front of my lower incisors (normal dentition has them meet and contact when the molars touch, preventing the clenching to a large extent). This is why I have evolved in the last couple of years of using what I coin a "bite sock" as well. The "bite sock" is a literal sock (I have five pair of new crew socks I bought for this purpose (10 total)). that I fold and knot together in such a way that it has a small, albeit thick region that I literally hold in my mouth to create points of contact between my upper and lower incisors.... and to prevent CLENCHING. As long as I hold the sock between my teeth while sleeping, it is a tremendous help. But I often spit out the sock while sleeping, and then I start clenching, even with the "best" remaining bite guard I have... with the inherent negative results.
So, my long windedness above is meant to try to explain that unfortunately no two bite guards are the same, even if it was wished they could be.
* * *
My title today was in reference to what I had planned to write about a bit... which is what appears to be a new RISE in the use of "jargon". Perhaps it is just my perception, but to me, it feels far more "1984-ish" today (Orwellian 1984, I mean) both politically, but also in terms of LANGUAGE than it has in a couple of decades. The breaking point that really brought this to my attention is of all things.... NPR! NPR is my major source of news, and I have been a regular listener for, hell, at least four decades if not closer to five decades. Over the years, more and more "commercial" pronouncements have crept into NPR to compensate for inadequate funding. These are not normal "jingle-jangly" commercials like on normal television and radio, but more akin to "public service-style" announcements usually with some monotone fellow or lady reading a name of a "donor" with a stock list of the company's goals and aspirations.
Over the last few weeks I have grown annoyed at two companies in particular with the PSA-like commercials on NPR.... one is for WorkDay.... the horrific program my U's HR Department adopted about 1.5 years ago that has been a nightmare for anyone not in the inner circle of HR jargon. The way our U utilizes this wretched program has folks across campus use WorkDay to submit all manner of purchase requests, travel requests, reimbursement requests etc through this system. But the system is a heirarchical MAZE of hundreds of dropdown menus with each menu having a dozen or more vague "categories" through which a request may be "properly" routed.
The issue is that these menu choices are ambiguous and there is no clarity of how to navigate this process. In each and every case I know of from at least 15 or so faculty I have talked with.... EVERY DAMN TIME we try to submit some request through WorkDay.... it gets sent back needing to be redone because the routing menu's specific dropdown categories were not correctly selected to route things where they are supposed to go. Perhaps this is some sort of "savings" for HR folks... but for every person not in HR who has to use this damnable program..... WorkDay..... INCREASES the amount of work we need to do..... every damn time.
Then, also on NPR is another PSA-like commercial for some other program (I have avoided learning (or at least remembering) the program or business name of this one) that is constably yammering about some slew of nonsense with phrases like "supply chain" "side chain ergonomics" and to increase "stabilization parameters" of a whole array of nonsensicial things. It was driving me batty to try to parse through the jargon to attempt to make sense of it..... instead, when I hear that particular announcement start, I try to tune out.... or change the radio dial to a different NPR channel.
***
I have been feeling a strong elevation of my sense of loss about my pipes. I had the very sincere plan to try to indulge in a bowl last Saturday during my extra trip to the shoppe due to my "bachelor status", but you may remember Gus' son was there and he gave me one of his Dad's cigar, so I worked through that instead.
That "near miss" opportunity.... perhaps was for the best emotionally. I am not sure. Part of what I find is so different (besides the robust beauty and charms of pipe tobaccos) between a pipe and a cigar may be confusing for many to understand. When I laid down my pipes 8 years ago (other than the THREE glorious times where I was able to allow myself the joy of one due to a special, prescribed occasion), I had never really been any sort of regular indulger in cigars.
When my friend from Mass first invited me to the Retiree's Cigar Group.... I did so with a specific mindset.... with my lack of a routine or a developed pattern of indulging in cigars..... I created a framework that felt "safe" in how I could allow myself to have a cigar with minimal risk. It would always be a) at the shoppe, b) usually only ONCE a week, and c) I would be more "purposeful" in the activity.... wholly concentrating on the experience while idulging, rather than just having it be a "routine" that just happened.
The above served me well, for it helped me establish thes sort of occasional pattern where I feel comfortable having an occasional cigar without much worry. But.... for the pipe.... it is a very different story:
1. I MUCH MORE significantly enjoy and appreciate pipes and pipe tobaccos compared to a cigar.
2. I have a beautiful, multiple decade relationship and patterning structure of how I indulged in my beloved pipes.... and it was never "occasional" and... was pretty much based upon the idea of a pattern of.... "whenever the mood struck"..... which would be often.
3. With the above two items.... in each of the beautiful three times I did allow myself to enjoy a pipe in these last 8 years.... I could very easily feel (and did feel) the strong pull to simply permit myself to gently slide back into the beautiful, decades-long pattern I had innately and naturally developed in my earlier life. I find that worrisome, as I am not sure if I have a strong enough fortitude of will to wrangle that passion consistently into just an occasional pattern.
4. So, the pattern I have ADOPTED and LEARNED as normal..... in indulging in a cigar is a comfortable, occasional one.... and it feels both comfortable as a pattern, and easy to not drift away from.
5. But, I am not sure if I could retrain an old dog (me) to a RELIABLE pattern of an occasional pipe in this same way. With the decades long "free-form" pattern as my normal..... I am not sure if I could successfully retrain my mind to accept this occasional route in a reliable way.... or would I simply cascade back to my "free-form" indulgence? My comfortable, "free-form" pattern of so long may not be able to be converted to "occasional".
Enough yammering today. I have to get some work done.
PipeTobacco