While monitoring one of my exams yesterday, I decided to count how many of my male students wore a wrist watch. Women have traditionally been more "sporadic" and watch wearing would take on many different forms (pendants and necklaces, although not common, occasionally occur) about wearing a watch, so I decided to just focus on the males this time.
I did this just out of curiosity because I know that wearing a watch has been in decline for young folks ever since the damn "smart" phone was developed.
In my informal count, With a class size of 135, in which 89 were female, this meant that I had 46 males to try to check.
In that sample, there were 2 absences.
Of the 44 I was able to observe.... I missed getting data on 5 of them due to answer other student's questions. So, my sample size was 39.
Of those 39 male students, only 12 wore a watch. And, of those 12, a full 7 of them were wearing "tracker" watches of one sort or another that paired to their phone. This means that in my examination, only a little over 12% of the population studied wore a TRADITIONAL wrist watch any longer.
I must say that I knew the number would be low..... but I am surprised at HOW LOW this rate is.
I personally feel "naked" without a wrist watch. I remember when I was 11 how I scrimped and saved any money I could so that I could scrape up enough to eventually by my first watch.... a cheap,, but wonderful, silver colored Timex hand wind watch. I felt truly "grown up" wearing it and would take it off only to wind it, shower, or swim.
If I recall correctly, I think it cost about $8.00. I wore it all through high school before I accidentally hit the bezel and it shattered. Mine looked something like the one I have pictured, except the face was white. Perhaps that one was too "back in the day"? Mine was likely even lower priced as my numbers were actually painted or stamped on, not metal like in the photo.
PipeTobacco