I am feeling old.
Numerically, I would be thought of as old, but I am not really talking about my age at the moment.
Nor am I speaking so much in the physical sense. I still did my 5 miles of running this morning, and actually have been also keeping consistent in my weight training as well to improve upper body tone.
I am talking about my mindset, I think. Here is what transpired:
My wife and I have always enjoyed movies, and have enjoyed going to movie theaters to watch movies. But, during the last several years, there has a been a steady decline in the number of films we see.
A big part of the reason for the decline is what *I* perceive as a considerable change in movie genre. In my view, there has been a dramatic change in the types of movies that would reach theaters. Today, it seems that the lion's share of movies are in only a few categories:
1. Comic Book / Fantasy films
2. Sequels of Comic Book / Fantasy films
3. "Epic" versions of Comic Book / Fantasy films (think the innumerable variations on "Star Wars" or "Lord of the Rings")
4. Action Films with so much CGI that they are in effect "Fantasay" films as well with added violence.
5. Horror/Murder/Slasher/Attack/Extreme Violence films
6. Raunchy "Comedies"
7. Raunchy "Comedic" Horror/Murder/Slasher/Attack/Extreme Violence films
8. Children's films
Now, I damn well know there are other films out there, but it seems in my neck of the woods (and I have checked in other cities as well.... but.... the above 8 PREDOMINATE virtually all theaters other than the rarer than platinum "art-house" theaters, that persist in some lucky locations.
So,,, when a self proclaimed "Romantic Comedy" called "Long Shot" suddenly appeared on the marquee at one of our theaters.... and it ALSO received good "Rotten Tomato" scores.... my wife and I made a beeline to go see it.
* * * * *
Well.....
* * * * *
How do I parse this out?
* * * * *
Ok.... here it goes....
1. If I were to judge the movie based upon about 50% of the screen time of the film, I could say it was a reasonably enjoyable, kind-of-sort-of romantic comedy of sorts. If I could have seen that 50% with the other 50% excised, I would probably have given the film a "B-" or a "C+" grade and would have been satisfied.
2. BUT.... this "Romantic Comedy" 's other 50% of screen time.... and I am serious.... had the dialog consist entirely of the very coarse cuss word that means to copulate and starts with the letter "F".
Now, seriously, I am not a prude by any means. I hear that particular word frequently (unfortunately) because it is so commonplace these days. BUT.... really..... it felt like EVERY THIRD WORD uttered in this film was that particular word. Added to this, one of the more "comedic" plot twists leading to the two main characters realizing they "loved" each other, was when the a video surfaced of the male lead sexually gratifying himself in front of a computer video camera.
Come on. None of that was funny, comedic, or enjoyable in my opinion. [sigh]
With all of the above in #2.... there was no other grade to give this film other than an "F".
The era of "gross out humor" and "comic book storylines" makes me feel awfully damn old.
PipeTobacco